大唐与巨点能源签署蓝气技术合作协议作者/来源： 日期： 2016-01-13 点击率：2
1月8日，大唐集团公司与美国巨点能源公司在京举行合作框架协议签署仪式。中国人民政治协商会议全国委员会副主席陈元亲临见证签署仪式并致辞。
根据协议内容，双方将在“蓝气技术”商业化示范装置建设有关领域加强合作。大唐克旗煤制天然气工厂能够为巨点能源公司“蓝气技术”示范装置建设提供场地和相应服务，巨点能源公司拥有研发高效、稳定、环境友好的“蓝气技术”，这使双方企业找到了合作契合点。
内蒙古克旗人民政府旗长潘存国在仪式上表示，克什克腾旗委、政府将一如既往地关心和支持大唐克什克腾煤制天然气项目建设，做好协调服务工作，为企业发展和项目生产建设营造良好的外部环境。
大唐集团公司董事长陈进行出席仪式并致辞。大唐集团公司副董事长、总经理王野平，美国巨点能源公司董事长白安儒代表双方签署协议。美国驻华大使馆公使衔商务参赞柯安平参加签署仪式，大唐集团公司副总经理王森主持签署仪式。
美国巨点能源公司开发了一步法煤制天然气技术，被称为蓝气技术。与传统煤制天然气工艺不同的是，该技术通过对催化反应过程的优化，实现了在一个加压流化反应器中催化三种反应（气化、变换和甲烷化），从而煤（或其他含碳物质）、蒸汽及催化剂可以在单一反应器内生产合成天然气。http://www.nmtech.com.cn/xinwen_mhg_xx.asp?id=174814下面是巨点对蓝气气化技术的中试操作描述，大家可从中管窥其“奥妙”！
国内某些公司总以为国外存在神秘的技术巧决，其实煤气化已经历很长的技术研发历程，能干什么，什么不能干都很清楚了。
一方面钱多任性，一方面满脑幻想。
当然了，美国人不差崇尚冒险精神，况且，万一有个难点难以攻克，美国人基本没有损失的。
M Swanson，A Henderson
The GreatPoint Energy (GPE) concept for producing synthetic natural gas and hydrogen from coal involves the catalytic gasification of coal and carbon. GPE’s technology “refines” coal by employing a novel catalyst to “crack” the carbon bonds and transform the coal into cleanburning methane (natural gas) and hydrogen. The GPE mild “catalytic” gasifier design and operating conditions result in reactor components that are less expensive and produce pipeline-grade methane and relatively high purity hydrogen. The system operates extremely efficiently on very low cost carbon sources such as lignites, subbituminous coals, tar sands, petcoke, and petroleum residual oil. In addition, GPE’s catalytic coal gasification process eliminates troublesome ash removal and slagging problems, reduces maintenance requirements, and increases thermal efficiency, significantly reducing the size of the air separation plant (a system that alone accounts for 20% of the capital cost of most gasification systems) in the catalytic gasification process. Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) pilot-scale gasification facilities were used to demonstrate how coal and catalyst are fed into a fluid-bed reactor with pressurized steam and a small amount of oxygen to “fluidize” the mixture and ensure constant contact between the catalyst and the carbon particles. In this environment, the catalyst facilitates multiple chemical reactions between the carbon and the steam on the surface of the coal. These reactions more» generate a mixture of predominantly methane, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Product gases from the process are sent to a gas-cleaning system where CO{sub 2} and other contaminants are removed. In a full-scale system, catalyst would be recovered from the bottom of the gasifier and recycled back into the fluid-bed reactor. The by-products (such as sulfur, nitrogen, and CO{sub 2}) would be captured and could be sold to the chemicals and petroleum industries, resulting in near-zero hazardous air or water pollution. This technology would also be conducive to the efficient coproduction of methane and hydrogen while also generating a relatively pure CO{sub 2} stream suitable for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or sequestration. Specific results of bench-scale testing in the 4- to 38-lb/hr range in the EERC pilot system demonstrated high methane yields approaching 15 mol%, with high hydrogen yields approaching 50%. This was compared to an existing catalytic gasification model developed by GPE for its process. Long-term operation was demonstrated on both Powder River Basin subbituminous coal and on petcoke feedstocks utilizing oxygen injection without creating significant bed agglomeration. Carbon conversion was greater than 80% while operating at temperatures less than 1400°F, even with the shorter-than-desired reactor height. Initial designs for the GPE gasification concept called for a height that could not be accommodated by the EERC pilot facility. More gas-phase residence time should allow the syngas to be converted even more to methane. Another goal of producing significant quantities of highly concentrated catalyzed char for catalyst recovery and material handling studies was also successful. A Pd–Cu membrane was also successfully tested and demonstrated to produce 2.54 lb/day of hydrogen permeate, exceeding the desired hydrogen permeate production rate of 2.0 lb/day while being tested on actual coal-derived syngas that had been cleaned with advanced warm-gas cleanup systems. The membranes did not appear to suffer any performance degradation after exposure to the cleaned, warm syngas over a nominal 100-hour test.其实在几年前大唐旗下子公司搞过该技术，后来不了了之。不是后来该技术被中国一家企业收购了吗？大唐不是基本放弃煤制气业务了吗？这是要卷土重来？
克旗煤制气还是大唐的产业。
http://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?m ... A%D2%F8%B5%E7%C1%A6
大唐旗下的华银电力几年前曾经大张旗鼓的用此技术投资煤制气的，后来因为某种原因放弃的，不知道蓝气技术现在的发展如何？有哪些重大的进展？大变革时期，批判性思维可能是创新的最大敌人，拭目以待吧。当年诺基亚也是这么看苹果的
1月8日，大唐集团公司与美国巨点能源公司在京举行合作框架协议签署仪式。中国人民政治协商会议全国委员会副主席陈元亲临见证签署仪式并致辞。
根据协议内容，双方将在“蓝气技术”商业化示范装置建设有关领域加强合作。大唐克旗煤制天然气工厂能够为巨点能源公司“蓝气技术”示范装置建设提供场地和相应服务，巨点能源公司拥有研发高效、稳定、环境友好的“蓝气技术”，这使双方企业找到了合作契合点。
内蒙古克旗人民政府旗长潘存国在仪式上表示，克什克腾旗委、政府将一如既往地关心和支持大唐克什克腾煤制天然气项目建设，做好协调服务工作，为企业发展和项目生产建设营造良好的外部环境。
大唐集团公司董事长陈进行出席仪式并致辞。大唐集团公司副董事长、总经理王野平，美国巨点能源公司董事长白安儒代表双方签署协议。美国驻华大使馆公使衔商务参赞柯安平参加签署仪式，大唐集团公司副总经理王森主持签署仪式。
美国巨点能源公司开发了一步法煤制天然气技术，被称为蓝气技术。与传统煤制天然气工艺不同的是，该技术通过对催化反应过程的优化，实现了在一个加压流化反应器中催化三种反应（气化、变换和甲烷化），从而煤（或其他含碳物质）、蒸汽及催化剂可以在单一反应器内生产合成天然气。http://www.nmtech.com.cn/xinwen_mhg_xx.asp?id=174814下面是巨点对蓝气气化技术的中试操作描述，大家可从中管窥其“奥妙”！
国内某些公司总以为国外存在神秘的技术巧决，其实煤气化已经历很长的技术研发历程，能干什么，什么不能干都很清楚了。
一方面钱多任性，一方面满脑幻想。
当然了，美国人不差崇尚冒险精神，况且，万一有个难点难以攻克，美国人基本没有损失的。
M Swanson，A Henderson
The GreatPoint Energy (GPE) concept for producing synthetic natural gas and hydrogen from coal involves the catalytic gasification of coal and carbon. GPE’s technology “refines” coal by employing a novel catalyst to “crack” the carbon bonds and transform the coal into cleanburning methane (natural gas) and hydrogen. The GPE mild “catalytic” gasifier design and operating conditions result in reactor components that are less expensive and produce pipeline-grade methane and relatively high purity hydrogen. The system operates extremely efficiently on very low cost carbon sources such as lignites, subbituminous coals, tar sands, petcoke, and petroleum residual oil. In addition, GPE’s catalytic coal gasification process eliminates troublesome ash removal and slagging problems, reduces maintenance requirements, and increases thermal efficiency, significantly reducing the size of the air separation plant (a system that alone accounts for 20% of the capital cost of most gasification systems) in the catalytic gasification process. Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) pilot-scale gasification facilities were used to demonstrate how coal and catalyst are fed into a fluid-bed reactor with pressurized steam and a small amount of oxygen to “fluidize” the mixture and ensure constant contact between the catalyst and the carbon particles. In this environment, the catalyst facilitates multiple chemical reactions between the carbon and the steam on the surface of the coal. These reactions more» generate a mixture of predominantly methane, hydrogen, and carbon dioxide. Product gases from the process are sent to a gas-cleaning system where CO{sub 2} and other contaminants are removed. In a full-scale system, catalyst would be recovered from the bottom of the gasifier and recycled back into the fluid-bed reactor. The by-products (such as sulfur, nitrogen, and CO{sub 2}) would be captured and could be sold to the chemicals and petroleum industries, resulting in near-zero hazardous air or water pollution. This technology would also be conducive to the efficient coproduction of methane and hydrogen while also generating a relatively pure CO{sub 2} stream suitable for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) or sequestration. Specific results of bench-scale testing in the 4- to 38-lb/hr range in the EERC pilot system demonstrated high methane yields approaching 15 mol%, with high hydrogen yields approaching 50%. This was compared to an existing catalytic gasification model developed by GPE for its process. Long-term operation was demonstrated on both Powder River Basin subbituminous coal and on petcoke feedstocks utilizing oxygen injection without creating significant bed agglomeration. Carbon conversion was greater than 80% while operating at temperatures less than 1400°F, even with the shorter-than-desired reactor height. Initial designs for the GPE gasification concept called for a height that could not be accommodated by the EERC pilot facility. More gas-phase residence time should allow the syngas to be converted even more to methane. Another goal of producing significant quantities of highly concentrated catalyzed char for catalyst recovery and material handling studies was also successful. A Pd–Cu membrane was also successfully tested and demonstrated to produce 2.54 lb/day of hydrogen permeate, exceeding the desired hydrogen permeate production rate of 2.0 lb/day while being tested on actual coal-derived syngas that had been cleaned with advanced warm-gas cleanup systems. The membranes did not appear to suffer any performance degradation after exposure to the cleaned, warm syngas over a nominal 100-hour test.其实在几年前大唐旗下子公司搞过该技术，后来不了了之。不是后来该技术被中国一家企业收购了吗？大唐不是基本放弃煤制气业务了吗？这是要卷土重来？
weixin 发表于 2016-2-10 23:17
大唐不是基本放弃煤制气业务了吗？这是要卷土重来？
克旗煤制气还是大唐的产业。
http://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?m ... A%D2%F8%B5%E7%C1%A6
大唐旗下的华银电力几年前曾经大张旗鼓的用此技术投资煤制气的，后来因为某种原因放弃的，不知道蓝气技术现在的发展如何？有哪些重大的进展？大变革时期，批判性思维可能是创新的最大敌人，拭目以待吧。当年诺基亚也是这么看苹果的
看过本文的人还看过
- 热点聚合: [db:关键词]
